An US judge chose Tuesday that victims of the Sept.

11, 2001, attacks are not entitled to take $3.5 billion of assets belonging to Afghanistan&& s central bank to please court judgments they obtained versus the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA), Reuters reported.US District Judge George Daniels in Manhattan stated he was && constitutionally restrained& & from discovering that the IEA was Afghanistan & s legitimate government, a precursor for attaching possessions coming from Da Afghanistan Bank, or DAB.Daniels said letting victims take those possessions would amount to a ruling that the IEA are Afghanistan&& s genuine government.He said US courts lack power to reach that conclusion, noting that Biden administration does not acknowledge the IEA as Afghanistan&& s federal government, checked out the report.

& The judgment financial institutions are entitled to gather on their default judgments and be made whole for the worst terrorist attack in our country&& s history, however they can refrain from doing so with the funds of the central bank of Afghanistan,& & Daniels wrote.

& The Taliban [Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan]-- not the previous Islamic Republic of Afghanistan or the Afghan individuals-- must spend for the IEA & s& liability in the 9/11 attacks, & he added.Daniels & decision is a defeat for four groups of judgment creditors that claimed some of the $7 billion of DAB funds that had been frozen at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York, Reuters reported.&& This choice deprives over 10,000 members of the 9/11 neighborhood of their right to collect settlement from the Taliban [IEA],& & said Lee Wolosky, a legal representative for one financial institution group known as the Havlish plaintiffs.

&& We believe it is mistakenly chosen and will appeal.&& The other creditor groups are also preparing an appeal, a separate Tuesday court filing programs, checked out the report.In an executive order last February, United States President Joe Biden ordered $3.5 billion of the DAB funds set aside to benefit the Afghan people.Last September, the US Treasury said it would move that cash to a Swiss-based trust beyond the IEA&& s reach.NOT THE IEA & S MONEYThe creditor groups had actually taken legal action against many offenders, consisting of al-Qaeda, over the Sept.

11 attacks, and obtained default judgments after the accuseds failed to show up in court, Reuters reported.At the time of the attacks, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan (IEA) had allowed al-Qaeda to run within Afghanistan.The United States ousted the IEA and al-Qaeda in late 2001, but the IEA went back to power in 2021 when Western forces pulled out of the country.In his 30-page choice, Daniels embraced findings of United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, who last August also recommended no recovery for the lender groups.Daniels stated he lacked jurisdiction over DAB under federal law since the bank was an instrumentality of a foreign government and therefore had immunity.He also stated Afghanistan, as opposed to the IEA, neither certified as a && terrorist party & nor had actually been designated a state sponsor of terrorism, checked out the report.&& Neither the Taliban [IEA] nor the judgment lenders are entitled to raid the coffers of the state of Afghanistan to pay the Taliban&& s debts, & Daniels wrote.Other nations recently held about $2 billion of Afghan reserves, Reuters reported.Nearly 3,000 individuals died on Sept.

11, 2001, when aircrafts were flown into New York&& s World Trade Center, the Pentagon in northern Virginia, and a Pennsylvania field.US sanctions ban doing monetary organization with the IEA however permit humanitarian assistance for the Afghan people.The case remains in re Terrorist Attacks on Sept.

11, 2001, United States District Court, Southern District of New York, No.

03-md-01570, Reuters reported.

The post Sept.

11 victims can not take Afghan reserve bank assets: US judge first appeared on Ariana News.